SALARY EXPECTATIONS

How to answer “What are your salary expectations?”

A good answer protects your position without becoming evasive. The aim is to understand the role, anchor the discussion in credible evidence and keep enough flexibility to evaluate the complete offer.

Updated September 2026 · By Giulio Famiglietti

Understand why the recruiter is asking

The question is usually a practical check: whether your expectations fit the approved range and whether it makes sense to continue the process. It is not yet the final negotiation.

Your answer should therefore be clear enough to establish alignment, but not so rigid that you commit before understanding the role, level and package.

Prepare a credible range

Research compensation for the role, level, location and company type. Use more than one source where possible, then adjust for the scope of the position and the experience you bring.

  • Floor: the minimum package that would make the move viable.
  • Target: the outcome you consider fair and attractive.
  • Evidence: market data, role scope and relevant experience.
  • Package: base, bonus, equity, pension, benefits and flexibility.

Do not present your private minimum as the bottom of your public range. A range should represent outcomes you could reasonably accept, not the widest possible interval.

If the question comes too early

When the responsibilities or level are still unclear, ask for the employer's budgeted range first. You can say: “I would like to understand the scope and level fully before giving a precise figure. Could you share the range budgeted for the position?”

If they require an answer, give a researched range and make the assumptions explicit: “Based on the scope described so far and comparable roles in this market, I would expect a base salary in the X–Y range, depending on the complete package.”

What to enter on an application form

If the field accepts text, “negotiable based on scope and total package” can preserve flexibility. If it requires a number, use a credible target rather than an artificially low figure designed only to pass the screen.

Where salary-history questions are restricted, keep the conversation focused on the role and your expectations. Rules vary by location, so check the current requirements that apply to you.

Answers that weaken your position

  1. “Anything is fine.” This suggests you have not assessed the market or your needs.
  2. An unexplained number. A figure without context can sound arbitrary.
  3. An enormous range. It gives little useful information and makes the lower end the obvious anchor.
  4. Your current salary as the only reference. The new role should be valued on its own scope.
  5. A fabricated competing offer. False leverage can damage trust and is difficult to sustain.

Revisit the discussion when an offer arrives

An early expectations conversation does not remove your right to assess and negotiate the eventual offer. The final role may be broader than initially described, and the complete package may change the comparison.

Give a range you can defend, then keep the final decision tied to the complete role and package.

Frequently asked questions

Should I give one number or a range?

A range normally communicates flexibility, provided both ends are credible. A single number can be useful when the employer asks for a precise target and you understand the role well.

Should I include bonus and equity?

Clarify whether you are discussing base salary or total compensation. Otherwise, two apparently similar figures may describe very different packages.

What if the employer's range is below mine?

Ask whether the level, scope or other elements can move. If the gap is structural, decide early whether continuing the process is worthwhile.

Prepare the answer before the recruiter asks.

Salary negotiation coaching helps you define a credible range, practise the conversation and prepare for the offer stage.

Explore salary negotiation coaching
ABOUT THE AUTHORGiulio Famiglietti

Giulio coaches professionals preparing for interviews, offers and compensation conversations. His approach combines market context, clear priorities and language that protects the relationship as well as the outcome.